The optimizations continue for dcrd, which got so much faster it got banned by older versions and the banning criteria have to be updated.
@moo31337 published a WIP PR for the work on decentralization of Treasury spending.
We welcome 5 new contributors to the Decred GitHub repositories!
It’s been a big month for integrations, with the gateways Transak and Metal Pay. Steelbackup (metal DCR seed storage solution) also added a new budget option.
In-person events are off, but virtual events are way up, especially in Latam!
Unless otherwise noted, the work reported here has the “merged to master” status. It means that the work is completed, reviewed, and integrated into the source code that advanced users can build and run, but is not yet available in release binaries for regular users.
more parts of the codebase migrated from Go’s standard big integers to specialized field types, making significant performance improvements
schnorr package: improvements to safety, testing, and performance, as well as a comprehensive README describing the custom Schnorr-based signature scheme used in Decred
A Schnorr signature is a digital signature scheme that is known for its simplicity, provable security, and efficient generation of short signatures. It provides many advantages over ECDSA signatures that make them ideal for use with the only real downside being that they are not well standardized at the time of this writing.
While the consensus supports Schnorr signatures, the rest of the infrastructure needed to fully take advantage of their benefits is not well fleshed out, and therefore they are not in widespread use yet. The goal is to remedy that.
With all the recent work, ECDSA and Schnorr signature verification is around 25% faster compared to v1.5.1.
Lots of optimizations in dcrd made over the past months have led to a “suffering from success” meme: older nodes now think the new version is requesting too much data too quickly and banning it. The “banning rate” parameters will have to be adjusted to reflect the new speeds.
The dcrd repository is no longer configured as a fork of btcd. So many new features have been added and overall improvements made that there is very little code still in common between them. Also, one of the primary reasons for having a fork is to be able to pull in upstream changes easily. That is not the case anymore though because the code is so different that any changes desired for dcrd would effectively have to be ported anyway. And even then, most changes made in btcd simply don’t apply to dcrd anymore. The “unforking” also removes the confusion about the fork count where dcrd page showed the number of all forks of btcd (1,500+). Now it shows 235 forks for dcrd and 1,290 for btcd. Finally, it removes the annoyance and a chance for error where pressing “New pull request” would open a PR against the upstream btcd repository with all the changes on Decred’s master branch.
The dcrctl command-line app that controls dcrd and dcrwallet was split out of dcrd into its own repository to address dependency and maintenance issues.
Decentralize Treasury Spending development work was published to make it more visible and let more people join the discussion. The work is based on the proposal but adds significant changes to the spec.
new method to query invoice line items that have been billed to the given proposal
separated metadata out of Politeia proposals and CMS invoices — this removes a hacky way to store proposal title that was used previously and allows to add arbitrary metadata, including the fields required by the RFP proposals
GitHub dcrd stars: 539 (+3), forks: 235 (-1,272) — past fork counts included all btcd forks which was misleading, now that the fork relationship with btcd is removed the number is dcrd’s own forks
In April the Treasury received 13,250 DCR and spent 17,228 DCR. Using April’s daily average DCR/USD rate of $12.34, this is $164K received and $213K spent. At March’s average daily rate of $13.40, the USD figure billed for work completed in that month is $231K. As of May 3, Treasury balance is 636,000 DCR (9.17 million USD at $14.42).
Two new proposals were submitted in April, one for a billboard marketing campaign was rejected with 17% approval (31% turnout) and another from CryptoNoticias for a content marketing campaign was also rejected with 31% approval and 30% turnout.
The two proposals from March voted on this month were also rejected. DCR Comic 2 had support from 49.4% of the tickets that voted (participation of 19%), while the Decred Daily proposal had 44% approval from the 17% of eligible tickets that voted. Both did not reach the quorum of 20% votes.
For more detail on these see issue 30 of Politeia Digest.
Hashrate: April’s hashrate opened at ~302 Ph/s and closed ~360 Ph/s, bottoming at 240 Ph/s and peaking at 470 Ph/s throughout the month. Pool hashrate distribution as of May 1: UUPool 46%, Poolin 22%, lab.antpool.com 17%, F2Pool 2%, Luxor 2%, BTC.com 1.6%, BeePool 0.12%, CoinMine 0.05%, Suprnova 0.02% and others ~9%. Pool distribution numbers are approximate and cannot be accurately determined.
Nodes: Throughout April there was an average of 131 public listening nodes and 206 total nodes per dcr.farm. Average version distribution for Apr: 44% dcrd v1.5.1, 16% dcrd v1.5, 6% dcrd v1.6 dev builds, 5% dcrd v1.5 dev and RC builds, 4% dcrd v1.4, 9% dcrwallet v1.5.1, 2.4% dcrwallet v1.4, 1.4% dcrwallet v1.5.
Updates from @Checkmate:
Decred section of the Our Network newsletter (tweet). Multiple metrics based on @Checkmate’s Stock-to-Flow model, PoW miner income, and @permabullnino’s ticket data research, signal that the network is undervalued.
Substantial on-chain volume relative to network valuation, NVT and RVT metrics.
dcr.blue VSP announced that it will shut down in a message sent to all users with verified email on Apr 20. It was removed from the listing and Decrediton but will stay online for the rest of 2020. Since the maximum lifetime of a ticket is roughly 4.7 months, this gives users around 3 months to stop buying tickets assigned to DCR.Blue. Users are advised to backup their redeem scripts if they haven’t already (a copy is available in the VSP account) and start buying tickets to a different VSP. Please avoid joining too large VSPs to maintain a healthy distribution and better security for the network. This is the first VSP to attempt a “graceful shutdown” rather than just disappearing without notice as some other VSPs have done in the past.
decred.raqamiya.net VSP that was delisted in March is now again operational and was added back to the listing. As of writing, it holds about 330 live tickets (0.8%), has 4 servers, and features a custom UI.
Metal Pay addedsupport for DCR on their marketplace. It provides another fiat onramp and works in most US states. They followed the announcement with tweets about Decred.
Transakannounced that trading DCR against EUR, GBP and INR is available on their fiat < > crypto payment gateway. USD pairs are coming soon.
Steelbackup, a physical seed backup solution added a light version of the product. Currently, there are two types of steel plates: laser engraved and laser marked. The engraved one is the most robust solution as steel is removed which makes the marking grid as permanent as the steel. The laser marked product is marked with a molybdenum disulfide solution which makes it resistant to scratches, acids, and high temperatures (up to 340 degrees C). The products are designed to be simple with no moving parts, users just need a center punch (found at a local hardware store) to indent their seed. Tamper evident bags are included. SteelBackup was launched in Feb 2020 by @zubair and ships worldwide.
Warning: the authors of the Decred Journal have no idea about the trustworthiness of any of the services above. Please do your own research before trusting your personal information or assets to any entity.
Decred’s YouTube channel grew by 4 new videos, while Decred in Depth and Rough Consensus podcasts released 3 episodes in total (see Media below).
Decred Brazil channel keeps actively generating content. Decred Semanal (“Decred Weekly”) published 5 new episodes in April which received ~150 views on average, up from ~50 views in previous months (likely a result of improved distribution tactics). The series is also available in podcast format on all major platforms like Apple (59 episodes total), Google, Spotify, SoundCloud and others.
Apr 4 — Paxful Conversations — Internet. @elian was invited by Paxful LATAM to talk about how to spot scams and what to look at when researching cryptocurrency fundamentals. It was not a direct Decred talk but it was mentioned as an example of good practices within the industry. The webinar was “powered by Decred” and was viewed by ~70 people.
Apr 9 — Hablemos Decred 03 — Internet. @pablito and @elian explained the PoS system. There were only 3 new viewers this time, although some lessons were learned about promoting the event and picking the optimal time. (report)
Apr 16 — Jalisco Talend Land @ Home — Internet. Decred team presented a panel titled “The future of money and remote work” to explore the intersection of money, technology, and remote working through the lens and experience of 4 Decred contractors in LATAM. They shared their experience working from Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico, and covered the challenges and opportunities of working for Decred remotely. (report)
Apr 16 — Hablemos de Criptomonedas — Internet. The webinar was co-hosted with Ibero University through its innovation hub IDIT. @adcade and @elian talked about cryptocurrency and blockchain to an audience of 22 (out of 34 registrations), mostly students. (report)
Apr 23 — Hablemos Decred 04 — Internet. @pablito and @elian focused on exchanges and the DEX that Decred is building. Attendance was up to 15 this time, and the LATAM team is continuing to explore the best ways to host such events. (report)
May 12 — Decred Foundations at Consensus Distributed (requires signup at brella.io to view and “attend”) — Internet. Consensus Distributed is the remote replacement for the annual Consensus conference, and Decred is one of the projects which was invited to contribute an hour of content, broken into 3 segments. In Construct, @richardred checks in with contributors to some important Decred subprojects to find out what they’re about and what the latest is. Featuring @lukebp on Politeia, @matheusd on dcrlnd, @chappjc, and @buck54321 on dcrdex, dcrdata and TinyDecred. The second segment is Trade Secrets, where @Checkmate will be giving a quick intro to his top 5 Decred on-chain metrics. To finish, @jy-p will present a review of the year’s progress across all of the major aspects of the project in ChangeLog, followed by a 10 minute live Q&A with Lucas Nuzzi. Video will be available on the Coindesk website afterwards, and an extended version of Trade Secrets will be uploaded to Youtube.
May 14 — Virtual meetup with BlockchainEx — Internet. Decred will participate in the panel “What is decentralized governance and DAOs?” co-hosted by @adcade and @caibarrad from Decred, Nadia Alvarez from MakerDAO, Gustavo Segovia from Colony and Jhonny Gomez from BlockchainEx. This panel will be live-streamed to the blockchain community in Colombia.
May 14 — Decred meetup with BlockConf — Internet. This will be a virtual meetup to showcase the platform and a fireside chat before the main conference. The team will give a brief on Decred’s fundamentals and new developments in the pipeline.
May 25 — BlockConf — Internet. Decred is a bronze sponsor. Decred LATAM team will run a virtual booth for Decred to answer questions from the attendees. If anyone wants to help with keeping the booth active in several time zones during the 48-hour event, please contact @elian.
Decred on-chain: Strongest hand market cap + ratio by @PermabullNino (medium)
Secrets they missed at DevCon: What it’s really like in a working DAO — in Portuguese by @mm.
Decred Journal March 2020 was translated to Arabic (@arij), Chinese (@Dominic), Polish (@kozel), and Spanish (@francov_). @kozel is back in the game with 4 translated issues since December. Shortened Spanish versions are available on Medium. Thank you all for building awareness of the project!
DCR 101 — Working for the Decred DAO by @Exitus (youtube)
Decred bi-weekly news update — April 18th, 2020 by @Exitus (youtube)
Decred Australia virtual meetup — BTC & DCR on-chain analytics event with @Checkmate (youtube)
Psychic Andre has good feelings about things going up, the video is mostly about the Federal Reserve but on the subject of Decred Andre says “they’re fine” (youtube)
The Federal Reserve in its own words. Protect your wealth, buy Decentralized Credits (twitter)
DCR 101 — How to stake Decred by @Exitus (youtube)
Decred price analysis — 17th April 2020 by Brave New Coin (youtube)
Rough Consensus Ep. 4 — Gold, Bitcoin, and Decred. @mr.black, @Checkmate, and @PermabullNino discuss the state of macro and crypto markets in the context of collapsing economies and unlimited QE. The conversation considers the nature of sound money and how gold, Bitcoin, and Decred represent different areas of the sound money spectrum. (libsyn)
Decred in Depth (has given up on numbering) — Chris Burniske of Placeholder VC talks about recent developments, why Decred HAS (Hypersecure Adaptable Sustainable) it, opportunities for dcrdex, and Politeia to expand the Decred ecosystem, and much more! (libsyn, youtube, soundcloud)
Selected Reddit posts:
The Decred Journal’s own Reddit post was the most discussed one on the subreddit this month with 42 comments!
The discussion of @bee’s idea to add vote reason information to Politeia votes concluded that implementing it properly requires a privacy solution like a blind voting scheme.
Phase 1 market making report discussion speculated about the rate of adoption.
Perspectives thread collected 33 comments of which many are long read quality thinking.
The post discussing @Checkmate’s methodology of comparing the attack cost of Decred and other chains.
Selected Twitter discussions:
@Checkmate tweeted about the cost to double spend attack DCR being 54x higher than BTC, stimulating much discussion.
@Checkmate announced the launch of a new project, with a team of contributors working on a new Decred on-chain metrics site.
Messari musing on what if Bitcoin had Decred’s treasury, and graphing out how much that would have been worth if Bitcoin had spent ~23% of its monthly treasury income and saved the rest.
@moo31337 tweeted about a WIP PR for work on the decentralized treasury spending proposal, but more than half of the comments were really concerned about his next cooking adventure.
In April DCR was trading between USD 11.08–15.01 / BTC 0.00151–0.00179. The average daily rate was $12.34.
@richardred wrote a report about the performance of the market makers during the term of their first proposal.
Another DeFi attack occurred, although this time dForce got most of its lost $25 million back from the attacker and users are being reimbursed.
On the more obscure stablecoin network PegNet, rogue miners turned a $11 pJYP balance into a 6.7 million pUSD balance by manipulating price oracles with a form of 51% attack. The attackers were unable to liquidate more than a small proportion of the pUSD, and have subsequently reached out to say they were just trying to pen test the network, and have burned the magically created pUSD.
People are wondering why ProgPoW is back on the Ethereum Core devs agenda, and whether the inability to shake it off means there is something rotten in Ethereum’s governance.
The US Government’s $349 billion loan program for small businesses has so far generated $10 billion in fees for banks, 1–5% for each loan processed, despite the very low risk the loans posed to the banks, considering that they were effectively just passing them on to the Small Business Administration which guaranteed all the loans. (plaintext version)
Maker Foundation is subject to a lawsuit from investors who lost money in Black Thursday.
There have been a whole barrage of class-action lawsuits filed against crypto exchanges and token issuers.
USDT balance held on exchanges has reached a new ATH of $1.8 billion on Apr 23, according to glassnode alerts.
YouTube have updated their policies to disallow anything about COVID-19 that goes against “authoritative sources” like the World Health Organization’s guidelines, as disclosed in an interview with YouTube’s CEO. While YouTube censoring videos on certain topics is not new, having these decisions be determined fluidly with reference to what “authoritative sources” are saying, and deliberately channelling traffic to those sources, is new.
In an update to the story about the sale of .org domain to a private equity firm, ICANN has voted to reject the sale, effectively blocking it.
About This Issue
This is issue 25 of Decred Journal. Index of all issues, mirrors, and translations is available here.
Most information from third parties is relayed directly from source after a minimal sanity check. The authors of the Decred Journal have no ability to verify all claims. Please beware of scams and do your own research.